"Humanity
is sitting on a time bomb. If the vast majority of the
world's
scientists are right, we have just ten years to avert a
major
catastrophe that could send our entire planet's climate system
into
a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather,
floods,
droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves beyond anything
we have
ever experienced - a catastrophe of our own making."
- Al Gore,
An Inconvenient
Truth
Global
Warming – Settled Science?
With
the continual bombardment of ‘climate doom’ stories
today, it is hard to imagine a time when global warming was not a
‘top priority’ on the social, political and economic
agenda. Everything from floods in England to poverty in the Third
World is now being blamed on global warming. However, it is a
relatively new phenomenon, barely discussed until 20 years ago, and
established as a significant policy issue only in the past 15 or so
years. Proclaiming that “climate change is
real” is a nonsensical statement and ignores the Earth’s continual natural
warming and cooling cycles. Vikings settled in Greenland
and raised crops and cattle 1000 years ago, while Britons grew grapes
in England. Four hundred years later, Greenland froze and the Vikings
starved. Europe was gripped in a Little Ice Age. The Thames froze all
the way up to London. Another surge in temperatures saw widespread
global droughts in the mid-1600s. Temperatures plunged again around
1700’s. The globe warmed in 1800-1940, cooled for the next 35
years, then warmed again. The 1940-1975 cooling period occurred
despite the fact that industrial production and release of CO2 vastly
accelerated during this time. This led to political and media
scaremongering about Global Cooling, and the threat of a new ice age.
Usually a scientific theory takes many decades to
become established, and only after the most rigorous testing under
many different scenarios, does it achieve ‘scientific
consensus’. However, when it comes to Global Warming its
proponents claim that there is no argument or debate to be had. Their
current crusade is to turn Global Warming into something that
supposedly no honest and decent person can disagree about, as they
have already done with ‘environmental sustainability’. Al
Gore often says “Climate change is a
moral issue.” In other words it is all about you,
and your destructive behaviour.
The United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has confidently
announced ‘the science is settled’ on man-made Global
Warming. Their most recent set of reports declares that “the
debate over the science of climate change is well and truly over.
Unified international political commitment is now urgently required
to take action to avoid dangerous climate change.”
However, the science is not settled. Many renowned
climatologists strongly disagree with the IPCC’s conclusions
about the cause and potential magnitude of Global Warming. More than
20,000 scientists have now signed the Oregon Petition which
criticises it as ‘flawed’ research and states that “any
human contribution to climate change has not yet been demonstrated.”
Dr Chris Landsea resigned from the IPCC because he “personally
could not in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I
view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being
scientifically unsound.”
The IPCC claims
that more than 2,500 respected scientists and policy makers
collaborate to write its climate change assessments but less than a
tenth of these ‘experts’ actually hold qualifications in
climatology, most were in fact educated in the political and social
sciences. The panel that edits and approves the reports are appointed
by the United Nations, and more than half are actually UN officials.
Dr Richard Lindzen, who is a genuine climate expert, resigned from
the IPCC process after his contributions were completely rewritten by
the panel.
"It's not 2,500
people offering their consensus, I participated in that. Each person
who is an author writes one or two pages in conjunction with someone
else. They travel around the world several times a year for several
years to write it and the summary for policymakers has the input of a
handful of scientists, but ultimately, it is written by
representatives of governments, and of environmental organizations,
each pushing their own agenda." - MIT's Professor of
Atmospheric Science Dr. Richard Lindzen on the IPCC report.
Czech
President Klaus stated “It is not fair
to refer to the UN panel as a group of scientists. The IPCC is not a
scientific institution. It's a political body, a sort of
non-government organization of green flavour. It's neither a forum of
neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people
are politicized scientists, and UN bureaucrats, who arrive there with
a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment."
Asserting ‘the science is settled’ ignores the
debate that still rages, and the constant shrieking by alarmists like
Al Gore reveals that Global Warming is being used to push a hidden
agenda. They are not really interested in the science at all. Even their much vaunted consensus is a
myth. The Global Warming Petition
Project has been signed by more than 31,000 American scientists,
including more than 9,000 with PhDs. Signers include world renowned
physicists such as Prof. Edward Teller and Prof. Freeman Dyson.
Nearly 4,000
signers are scientists trained in specialties directly related to
the physical environment of the Earth and the past and current
phenomena that affect that environment.
The petition states: “There
is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon
dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in
the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's
atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is
substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon
dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and
animal environments of the Earth.”
Again, this arose out of a misunderstanding of long term
temperature fluctuations. Scientists have discovered that the sun not
only has a regular 11 year cycle of sunspot activity. They have now
discovered a significant 200 year cycle. Sunspot and solar radiation
activity almost exactly parallel temperature changes on the Earth. It
correlates well with the anomalous post-war temperature dip, when
global carbon dioxide levels were rising very fast. The increase in
solar radiation prevents the formation of clouds, which have a
cooling effect on the planet, therefore the temperature rises.
Other recent studies, published in Nature and other leading journals, conclude that the sun’s radiant heat and solar radiation levels affect planetary warming and cloud formation more strongly than acknowledged by Global Warming alarmists. After all, why would natural forces that caused the climate to change in past centuries suddenly stop now? And how does man-made Global Warming explain why every planet in our solar system appears to be simultaneously warming up? Does this not suggest that Global Warming is a natural cycle as a result of the dynamic nature of the sun?
”Global
Warming on Pluto Puzzles Scientists: Astronomers today said Pluto is
undergoing global warming in its thin atmosphere even as it moves
farther from the Sun on its long, odd-shaped orbit.”
- Space.com
”Global
Warming on Mars? A study of the ice caps on Mars may show that
the red planet is experiencing a warming trend. If both Mars and
Earth are experiencing global warming, then perhaps there is a larger
phenomenon going on in the Solar System that is causing their global
climates to change.” - National
Geographic
“NASA
says its Cassini spacecraft has found a hurricane-like storm at
Saturn's South Pole, nearly 5,000 miles across - or two-thirds
Earth's diameter.” - New
Scientist
"Global
Warming Detected on Triton: At least since 1989, Triton has been
undergoing a period of global warming," confirms
astronomer James
Elliot, professor of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary
Sciences at MIT. "Percentage-wise, it's
a very large increase."
“New
Storm on Jupiter Hints at Climate Change: The latest images
could provide evidence that Jupiter is in the midst of a global
change that can modify temperatures by as much as 10 degrees
Fahrenheit on different parts of the globe.” -
Space.com
“The
Earth is getting hotter because the Sun is burning more brightly than
at any time during the past 1,000 years, according to new research
published in the prestigious science journal Nature.”
- London
Telegraph
In truth we still know very
little about how the Sun really operates. This
is one of the reasons why I cringe when global warming alarmists
categorically state that the sun could not possibly be the cause of
any slight warming that has been observed on earth. A new type of
telescope developed by the Japanese has revealed all sorts of energy
patterns and violent eruptions that could not previously be observed,
and their effect on earth is unknown.
“A
Japanese space telescope called Hinode has achieved success in
revealing certain surprising characteristics of the Sun, previously
not known to humans. Among the characteristics revealed is the
restless bubbling and frothing of the Sun's chaotic surface, which
has astonished astronomers around the world. "Everything
we thought we knew about X-ray images of the Sun is now out of date,"
scientists told a NASA press conference in Washington on Wednesday.
According to Leon Golub from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center
for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US. "We've seen
many new and unexpected things. For that reason alone, the
mission is already a success." Hinode has sent back startling
images of the Sun's outer limb. Where astronomers expected to see a
calm region called the chromosphere, they saw a seething mass
of swaying spikes. Another surprise sighting is that of giant
magnetic field loops crashing down onto the Sun's surface as if they
were collapsing from exhaustion, a finding that Golub describes as
"impossible".
http://news.sawf.org/Health/34957.aspx
Recently
another unexpected solar phenomenon was observed:
“Astronomers
have captured the first footage of a solar "tsunami"
hurtling through the Sun's atmosphere at over a million kilometres
per hour. Details were reported at the UK National Astronomy Meeting
in Belfast. In a solar tsunami, a huge explosion near the Sun, such
as a coronal mass ejection or flare, causes a pressure pulse to
propagate outwards in a circular pattern. Last year's solar tsunami,
which took place on 19 May 2007, lasted for about 35 minutes,
reaching peak speeds about 20 minutes after the initial blast.
Co-author David Long commented: "The
energy released in these explosions is phenomenal; about two billion
times the annual world energy consumption in just a fraction of a
second.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7326097.stm
Apart
from ignoring the giant ball of fire in the sky, Global Warming
alarmists also overlook a few other inconvenient truths. They ignore
the fact the natural emissions
of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere far exceed human contributions.
In fact humans contribute a measly 0.035% of the total annual carbon
flux. Any system that can be perturbed by such a tiny fluctuation
would be very unstable indeed. They also ignore the fact that water
vapour is by far the most dominant greenhouse gas. The atmosphere
consists of 40,000 ppm of water vapour, whereas carbon dioxide weighs
in at a miniscule 380 ppm. Instead they rely on dubious computer
models that the IPCC itself admits exclude complex parts of the
climate system that they don’t yet understand.
Sometime
in the late 1990s activists decided to abandon the name Global
Warming and switched instead to Climate Change. This has two
advantages. It allows them to seize as ‘evidence’ the
inevitable occurrences of unusually cold weather as well as warm
ones. The climate is always changing, but now any storm, hurricane,
tornado, flood, frost or drought is instantly used as “proof
that our climate is changing!”
Global
Warming has almost become religious dogma for many in the green
movement. High priest Al Gore demands that we accept a "scientific
truth" in which no doubt is allowed, blind faith and acceptance
is our only option. They label anyone who questions their claims to
be “climate deniers”, a cheap and quite despicable
comparison to Holocaust deniers. There is a sustained campaign to
prevent these heretics from having any sort of public platform for
their views. Every scientist who manifests disbelief can expect to be
the target of abuse from self-appointed protectors of the planet.
Al Gore’s Live Earth
concerts were one of the most blatant attempts at mass manipulation
and brainwashing that I have ever witnessed. The broadcast
continually urged viewers to “Answer
the Call” and “Save
Our Selves”. Films clips were shown of New York City
hundreds of feet under water. One clip was titled “A contract
with Satan”. Another showed a man eating the last piece of ice
on earth. Very subliminal!
As in other forms of mental
conditioning, continual reinforcement is a necessary part of the
process and that is where ritual comes in. Switching off our VCR’s
at the wall every night, cycling to work, sacrificing our humble
incandescent light-bulbs, anxiously calculating our carbon
footprints, it all helps to soothe our guilt and makes us feel like
we are doing our part.
In medieval times the Catholic Pardoner
sold Papal Indulgences, which freed the prosperous from the
consequences of sin. They were able to indulge in carnal pleasures as
long as they could pay the price. Likewise, the new pardoners sell
carbon offsets. Soon every time you commit the sin of driving your
car you will be forced pay the price for ‘wounding the planet’.
Some faceless company will agree to plant an imaginary tree to atone
for your climate crimes.
The hoax of the man-made Global
Warming is being imposed on the world by many methods, both subtle
and blatant. Proponents of the Global Green Agenda have embarked on a
programme of mass deception, while scientists who attempt to blow the
whistle on the fraud are silenced, tarred, ridiculed and fired. The
Gaian cult that has permeated the United Nations is using the
hysteria of Global Warming to impose draconian control measures on
society and centralise world power. They intend to use this
fabricated crisis, and any other crisis that might arise, to further
their plan for “a sustainable global human society living in
harmony with Gaia.” They have declared "the science is
settled" on the man-made origins of Global Warming. Real
scientists know that science is never settled. We have seen it all
before.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
”There
are ominous signs that the earth's weather patterns have begun to
change and cool dramatically and that these changes may portend a
drastic decline in food production - with serious political
implications for just about every nation on earth. The drop in food
production could begin quite soon. The evidence in support of these
predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that
meteorologist are hard-pressed to keep up with it.”
- Newsweek, April 28, (1975)
“This
cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it
continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine,
world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the
year 2000.” - Lowell Ponte "The Cooling"
(1976)
“The continued rapid cooling of the
earth since WWII is in accord with the increase in global air
pollution associated with industrialization, mechanization,
urbanization and exploding population.” - Reid Bryson,
Global Ecology (1971)
“The battle to feed humanity
is over. In the 1970s, the world will undergo famines. Hundreds of
millions of people are going to starve to death in spite of any crash
programs embarked upon now. Population control is the only answer.”
- Prof. Paul Ehrlich - The Population Bomb (1968)
“In
ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large
areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of
dead fish.” - Prof. Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day (1970)
“This cooling trend will
reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century.”
- Peter Gwynne, climatologist, Newsweek (1976)
“If
present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder
for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder by
the year 2000...This is about twice what it would take to put us in
an ice age.” - Kenneth Watt, Earth Day (1970)