"Building
an environmentally sustainable future
requires nothing short of a
REVOLUTION...
restructuring the GLOBAL ECONOMY,
dramatically
changing human reproductive
behaviour and altering values
and lifestyles."
- Lester
Brown,
President of WorldWatch International
Sustainable
Development – A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
On my Home
Page
the influential leaders who have been actively guiding the
emergence of the environmental movement described their true beliefs
and agenda in their own words. But how can they possibly bring about
the global political, economic, social and religious transformation
they desire? The tool employed must be so potent and pervasive that
it reaches into every area of society, from local community groups to
sovereign governments and multinational corporations. It must have
the power to enforce binding international agreements, exert
stringent controls over human activities and yet still be acceptable
to the general population. It must become so entrenched in
legislation and business practice that its necessity is barely
questioned.
Such a tool exists. They have been carefully
shaping and nurturing its progress for decades. It is known as the
doctrine of Sustainable Development. We are all aware of need to
address environmental problems such as water and air pollution, and
dwindling natural resources, but Sustainable Development is exerting
draconian controls and influence far beyond those required for
effective environmental management.
The concept of
'environmental sustainability' was first brought to widespread public
attention in 1972 by the Club of Rome in their book entitled The
Limits to Growth. The official summary can be read here.
The report basically concluded that the growth of the human
population, and an increase in prosperity, would cause an ecological
collapse within the fifty years. The book is considered to be the
most successful environmental publication ever produced and propelled
the Club of Rome to its current position of an environmental
thought-leader and a major consultant to the United Nations.
It
has been translated into more than forty languages and sold more than
15 million copies. Throughout the 1970s and 80s the concept that
humanity was irreparably damaging the earth gained credence and
facilitated the formation of mainstream and activist environmental
groups. As discussed in a previous
article the
Club of Rome has been calling for “a
Masterplan to guide world development” since its
very inception.
In Nature organic
growth proceeds according to a Master Plan, a Blueprint.
According to this master plan diversification among cells is
determined by the requirements of the various organs; the size and
shape of the organs and, therefore, their growth processes are
determined by their function, which in turn depends on the needs of
the whole organism. Such a ‘master plan’ is missing
from the process of growth and development of the world system.
Now is the time to draw up a master plan for
organic sustainable growth and world development based on global
allocation of all finite resources and a new global economic
system. ” - Mankind at the Turning Point,
CoR, 1974
Interestingly, just prior to the birth of
“Sustainable Development” a well-dressed, articulate man
visited a small construction company in Georgia, USA, and announced
that he wanted to build an edifice to transmit a message to mankind.
He said that he represented a group of men who wanted to offer
direction to humanity, but to date, more than two decades later, no
one knows who he really was, or who he represented. The stranger gave
the company very detailed design documents and stated the money was
not an issue.
The “Georgia
Guidestones”
were completed six months later in 1980. As noted in the Wikipedia
entry “The content of the message
bears a remarkable resemblance to the so called Earth Charter, a
statement of vision of the Earth Charter Initiative of Mikhail
Gorbachev (Green Cross International) and Maurice Strong (Earth
Summit).”
The monument stands high on a
hilltop, and is almost twenty feet tall. It is made from five granite
slabs that weigh more than 100 tons, with a capstone connecting the
slabs. A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles
is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages,
one language on each face of the four large upright stones. Moving
clockwise around the monument from due north, these languages are:
English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese and
Russian. The message in English reads:
1.
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with
nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness
and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new
language.
4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all
things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations
with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule
internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal
rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth - beauty - love -
seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on
the earth - Leave room for nature.
A shorter message appears on the
four vertical surfaces of the capstone, again in a different language
and script on each face. The explanatory tablet near the Guidestones
identifies these languages/scripts as Babylonian Cuneiform (north),
Classical Greek (east), Sanskrit (south), and Egyptian Hieroglyphs
(west), and provides what is presumably an English translation: "Let
these be guidestones to an age of reason." The
Guidestones have become famous as 'America's Stonehenge'. The origin
of the Stones remains a mystery but the implications of these
guidelines, especially the first two, are disturbing to say the
least.
Sustainable Development is a doctrine devised by the
former Prime Minister of Norway Gro Harlem Brundtland. The UN
Secretary-General, Javier Perez de Cuellar, asked Mrs. Brundtland to
chair a World Commission focusing on "long-term
environmental strategies for achieving sustainable development by the
year 2000 and beyond." She was asked "to help
formulate a compelling call for political action on behalf of the
environment”. Members of the 'Brundtland Commission' came
from 21 nations, more than half in the developing world. After three
years, including public hearings in the capitals of 15 countries,
what now is often called simply the ‘Brundtland Commission’
published a report titled Our
Common Future.
"Over
the course of this century, the relationship between the human world
and the planet that sustains it has undergone a profound change,"
said the report. "When the century
began, neither human numbers or technology had the power radically to
alter planetary systems. As the century closes, not only do
vastly increased human numbers and their activities have that power,
but major, unintended changes are occurring in the atmosphere, in
soils, in water, among plants and animals, and in the relationships
among all of these. The rate of change is outstripping the ability of
scientific disciplines and our current capabilities to assess and
advise."
This
sentiment strongly echoes the Limits to
Growth published by the Club of Rome nearly twenty years
previously. It also surmised that "major,
unintended changes are occurring in the atmosphere, in soils, in
waters, among plants and animals. Nature is bountiful but it is also
fragile and finely balanced. There are thresholds that cannot be
crossed without endangering the basic integrity of the system. Today
we are close to many of those thresholds."
In issuing a call for various actions, the report offered a
now-famous definition of what it referred to as sustainable
development: "A form of development
that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generations to meet their own needs." The
Brundtland Commission called for an international conference to be
convened "within an appropriate period"
after the presentation of its report to review progress and create a
follow-up structure.
That conference, the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development, or Earth Summit, was held
in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. At the Rio 'Earth Summit',
representatives of more than 170 nations, including the United
States, agreed to work toward sustainable development of the planet.
More specific agreements, most not legally binding, focused on topics
of global significance such as climate change, loss of biodiversity,
management of the earth’s forests and the responsibilities and
rights of nations. A global plan of action developed in Rio was
titled Agenda 21, referring to the 21st century.
At the
opening session of the Rio Earth Summit Maurice Strong, the United
Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Secretary-General, bemoaned the
world's "explosive increase in
Population" and warned "we
have been the most successful species ever; we are now a species out
of control. Population must be stabilized and rapidly."
His speech also stated that "current
lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class -
involving high meat intake use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and
work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not
sustainable. A shift is necessary which will require a vast
strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United
Nations."
Mr
Strong has since stated that “The
United States is the greatest threat to the global environment. It is
guilty of environmental aggression against the planet”
and “Isn't the only hope for the
planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our
responsiblity to bring that about?"
Sustainable
Development, as outlined in Agenda 21 and the subsequent Earth
Charter, is the driving force behind what Al Gore calls a "wrenching
transformation" that society must endure to repair
what he perceives as the damage of the 20th century's Industrial
Revolution. It is the same Industrial Revolution that gave us modern
transportation, medicine, indoor plumbing, healthy drinking water,
central heating, air conditioning, and electric light. Sustainable
Development is not about environmental clean up of rivers, air and
litter. It is an all-encompassing socialist scheme to combine social
welfare programs with government control of private business,
socialized medicine, national zoning controls of private property and
restructuring of school curriculum which serves to indoctrinate
children into politically correct group think.
Immediately
following the publication of Brundtland Commission report and the
Earth Summit many governments swiftly enacted draconian legislation
to empower the Sustainable Development doctrine. This followed a
common formula of establishing regional or federal authorities that
were given sweeping powers to control activities on private property.
In Europe nearly every imaginable activity, no matter how benign, now
requires and environmental impact assessment to be submitted to a
committee which then imposes its own controls on the proposed
activity. The UN regularly audits member countries and reports on
their progress in implementing Agenda 21.
The primary tools
used by the UN to force governments to implement its Sustainable
Development agenda have been The World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund (IMF). The World Bank states that Sustainable
Development is its “global strategic
priority” and all government loans are tagged with
the requirement to introduce approved environmental legislation and
strict monitoring. Even if repayments are met these loans can be
foreclosed if the environmental targets are not met within the
required timeframe.
In his book, Earth in the Balance, Al
Gore insists "We must all become
partners in a bold effort to change the very foundation of our
civilization. We must make the rescue of the environment the central
organizing principle for civilization."
Sustainable Development advocates seek oppressive taxes to control
and punish behavior of which they don't approve and there is much
these advocates disapprove, including air conditioning, fast foods,
suburban housing and automobiles. Every aspect of our lives is
affected by Sustainable Development policies. It is top-down control
from an all-powerful central government, specifically the United
Nations which seeks to assert such control.
The philosophy
behind Sustainable Development is to foster a mentality of guilt in
people over the use of natural resources. Every time one starts their
car... every time one turns on the tap... remember, be
sustainable! Don't exceed your allotment of resources.... We all
must learn to live the same, think the same and most importantly...
be sustainable! We are encouraged to calculate our 'ecological
footprint', or more recently, our 'carbon footprint'. Using a humble
incandescent light bulb is now considered a crime against the planet
by some. During the recent Earth Hour there were people in my city
banging on their neighbours door telling them to switch off their
lights. This collective guilt trip is being used to develop the
global consciousness that
I discussed in my previous
article. Even
back in 1974 the Club of Rome stated in Mankind
at the Turning Point:
“A
world consciousness must be developed through which every
individual realizes his role as a member of the world community... If
the human species is to survive, man must develop a sense of
identification with future generations and be ready to trade
benefits to the next generations for the benefits to himself. If each
generation aims at maximum good for itself, Homo sapiens are as
good as doomed “
The next
revolution in the Sustainable Development saga appears to be the use
of Global Warming hysteria to implement a global carbon tax or carbon
credit trading system. This will give the United Nations, or whatever
hierarchy oversees the system, complete control of the worlds
economy. Fossil fuels are the life blood of any economy. One barrel
of oil contains 23,000 hours of human work output. Controlling the
amount of oil that can be consumed, and taxing its consumption, will
complete the Sustainable Development agenda of controlling and
reducing human activity in order to protect Mother Earth from her
greatest enemy – humans!
"Humans
on the Earth behave in some ways like a
pathogenic micro-organism,
or like the cells of a tumor.“
- Sir James
Lovelock,
Healing
Gaia: Practical Medicine for the Planet